By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Mary Pat Thynge in SunPower Corp. v. PanelClaw, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-1633-MPT (D.Del., April 1, 2016), the Court granted defendant PanelClaw’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,505,788 (“the ‘788 patent”).[1]  In granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al., Civil Action No. 11-1298-LPS (D.Del., December 11, 2015), the Court dismissed without prejudice the parties’ declaratory judgment claims and affirmative defenses relating to the existence of an implied license. The Court concluded that

Gregory B. Williams, a partner in the Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA offices of Fox Rothschild, has been named to Delaware Today’s Top Lawyer List for 2015 for Civil Litigation.  Greg, an experienced litigator and trial attorney with more than 20 years of experience, has a diverse practice focused on commercial, intellectual property and other

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., et al. v. Zydus Noveltech Inc., Civil Action No. 14-1104-RGA (D.Del., August 7, 2015), the Court granted Defendant Zydus Noveltech Inc.’s motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction.

Plaintiffs did not dispute the lack of general jurisdiction over

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in InterDigital, Inc., et al. v. Wistron Corp., Civil Action No. 15-478-LPS (D.Del., June 18, 2015), the Court granted the emergency motion of Plaintiffs, InterDigital, Inc., InterDigital Technology Corporation, IPR Licensing, Inc., and InterDigital Patent Holding, Inc., to remand the action to the Delaware

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sherry R. Fallon in Monec Holdings AG v. Motorola Mobility, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 11-798-LPS-SRF (D.Del., September 5, 2014), the Court granted the motion of defendants HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, “HTC”) to strike the opening summary judgment and Daubert filings of plaintiff

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in M/A- COM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. v. Laird Technologies, Inc., C.A. 14-181-LPS (D.Del., June 13, 2014), the Court granted Plaintiff M/A-Com Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.’s (“MACOM”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction seeking to enjoin Defendant Laird Technologies, Inc. (“Laird”) from supplying Ford Motor Company

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Versata Software, Inc., et al. v. Callidus Software, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-931-SLR (D.Del., May 8, 2014), the Court denied defendant Callidus Software, Inc.’s motion to stay pending post-grant review of the patents-in-suit pursuant to the “covered business method” (“CBM”) patent review process

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, Civil Action 10-1055-RGA (D.Del., February 21, 2014), the Court granted Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment in part and denied it in part. The Court also denied Plaintiff Robocast, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No

By Memorandum Order entered by the Honorable Richard G. Andrews in L-3 Communications Corporation v. Sony Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 10-734-RGA (D.Del., October 16, 2013), the Court denied Plaintiff L-3 Communications Corporation’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that U.S. Patent No. 5,541,654 (the ”Roberts patent”) is not invalid in light of U.S.