By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Enzo v. Gen-Probe Inc., Civil Action No. 12-104-LPS (consolidated) (D.Del., June 28, 2017), the Court granted the motion
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of ‘180 Patent Based on Nonenablement
Patent Actions
Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Vehicle IP, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 09-1007-LPS (D.Del., December 30, 2016), the…
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement
Judge Andrews Grants Defendants’ Motion for Certification of Partial Final Judgment as to Finding of Liability for Infringement of Patents
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in InterDigital Communications, Inc. v. ZTE Corp., Civil Action No. 13-009-RGA (D.Del., June 7, 2016), the Court granted Defendants’…
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Grants Defendants’ Motion for Certification of Partial Final Judgment as to Finding of Liability for Infringement of Patents
Judge Andrews Concludes Boeing is A Required Plaintiff in Patent Infringement Action
By Memorandum entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-228-RGA (D.Del., June 3, 2016) (consolidated), the Court held…
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Concludes Boeing is A Required Plaintiff in Patent Infringement Action
Judge Robinson Grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint in ANDA Action
By Memorandum Opinion entered by the The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 14-1268-SLR (D.Del., May 18,…
Continue Reading Judge Robinson Grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint in ANDA Action
Judge Sleet Concludes that Defendants Did Not Prove Invalidity of Asserted Claim in ANDA Action
Following a four day bench trial in a consolidated ANDA action before The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Genzyme Corp., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al.,…
Continue Reading Judge Sleet Concludes that Defendants Did Not Prove Invalidity of Asserted Claim in ANDA Action
Chief Judge Stark Grants JHU’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of a Priority Date of No Later Than June 5, 2003 for Count in Interference
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Johns Hopkins University v. 454 Life Sciences Corp., Civil Action No. 13-1853-LPS (D.Del., May 2, 2016), the Court…
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants JHU’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of a Priority Date of No Later Than June 5, 2003 for Count in Interference
Chief Judge Stark Grants Prevailing Defendant’s Motion for Review Taxation of Costs
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Walker Digital, LLC v. Google, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-318-LPS (D.Del., April 12, 2016), the Court granted defendant…
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants Prevailing Defendant’s Motion for Review Taxation of Costs
Judge Thynge Grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement After Adopting the PTAB’s Construction of Phrases in Patent’s Independent Claim
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Mary Pat Thynge in SunPower Corp. v. PanelClaw, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-1633-MPT (D.Del., April 1, 2016), the Court granted defendant PanelClaw’s…
Continue Reading Judge Thynge Grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement After Adopting the PTAB’s Construction of Phrases in Patent’s Independent Claim
Chief Judge Stark Dismisses Parties’ Implied License Claims and Defenses Based on Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al., Civil Action No. 11-1298-LPS (D.Del., December 11, 2015),…
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Dismisses Parties’ Implied License Claims and Defenses Based on Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction