abbreviated new drug application

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in Pharmacyclics LLC et al. v. Alvogen Pine Brook LLC et al., Civil Action No. 19-0434-CFC-CJB (D.Del. August 19,
Continue Reading Chief Judge Connolly Issues Comprehensive Opinion Setting Forth Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Infringement Claims and Invalidity Defenses as to Patents-in-Suit Following ANDA Trial

Following a four-day bench trial before him in Shire Orphan Therapies LLC et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, Civil Action No. 15-1102-GMS (D.Del. June 5, 2018), and having considered
Continue Reading Judge Sleet Concludes that Asserted Claims of Patent In-Suit Are Not Invalid Due to Obviousness-Type Double Patenting and No Grounds for Prosecution Laches Are Present

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Amgen Inc. v. Macleods Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Civil Action No. 17-817-GMS (D.Del. December 19, 2017) (consolidated), the Court denied
Continue Reading Judge Sleet Denies Macleods Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in ANDA Action

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited et al., Civil Action No. 14-1203-LP (D.Del. October 16, 2017), the
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Denies Prevailing Party’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses in ANDA Action

Following a three-day bench trial in the matter on June 5-7, 2017 and after having considered the entire record in the case and the applicable law, the Court, through Trial
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Finds Plaintiff Proved Infringement of Asserted Claims of Patents-in-Suit Following Three-Day Bench Trial in Hatch-Waxman Action

Following a five-day bench trial in the matter in February 2017 and after having considered the entire record in the case and the applicable law, the Court, through Memorandum, entered
Continue Reading Judge Sleet Invalidates Patents-in-Suit After Finding of Obviousness and Enters Judgment in Favor of Alleged Infringer in Hatch-Waxman Action

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in UCB, Inc., et al. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 14-1083-LPS-SRF (D.Del., May 19, 2017),
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motion for Reargument of Court’s Order Holding Defendants Liable for Costs of ANDA Litigation Going Forward Under Certain Conditions

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Civil Action No. 14-1203-LPS (D.Del. March 6, 2017), the Court granted
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement in ANDA Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Recro Gainesville LLC v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-1118-GMS (D.Del. February 24, 2017)(consolidated), the Court,
Continue Reading Judge Sleet Finds that Actavis’ Proposed ANDA Products Infringe Recro’s Asserted Patents

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-874-SLR (D.Del., November 16, 2016),
Continue Reading After Two Day Bench Trial in ANDA Action, Judge Robinson Finds The ‘353 Patent Valid But Not Infringed by Generic