By Claim Construction Opinion entered in The Medicines Company v.Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 09-750-RGA (D.Del., July 11, 2013), The Honorable Richard G. Andrews construed three disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos.7,582,727  and 7,598,343 (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”).  The patents-in-suit are familial patents with identical specifications and both seek to facilitate the production

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in XpertUniverse, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Civil Action No. 09-157-RGA (D.Del., March 7, 2013), the Court granted in part the Daubert motion of defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. to exclude the proposed testimony of plaintiff’s expert on direct infringement and secondary considerations. Specifically, the Court

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corporation, Civil Action No. 10-610-RGA (D.Del., February 21, 2013), the Court granted the Daubert motion of defendant Intel Corporation seeking to exclude the proposed testimony of the expert witness on damages for plaintiff AVM Technologies, LLC. The Court

By Memorandum Order entered in IPVenture Inc. v. Lenovo Group, Limited, et al., Civil Action No. 11-588-RGA (D.Del., January 8, 2013), the Honorable Richard G. Andrews granted in substantial part the motions of defendant Dell and other defendants seeking the dismissal of the claims of indirect infringement and willfulness asserted in the Second Amended Complaint of plaintiff IPVenture Inc. (“IPVenture”).

A complete copy of the Memorandum Order is attached.
 


Continue Reading Judge Andrews Grants in Substantial Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss IP Venture’s Claims of Indirect Infringement and Willfulness

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Round Rock Research, LLC v. Dell, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-976-RGA (D.Del., November 15, 2012), the Court denied defendant Dell, Inc.’s motion to transfer the action to the Northern District of California. In denying the motion to transfer, the Court carefully analyzed and

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Pragmatus Telecom, LLC v. Advanced Store Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 12-088-RGA (D.Del., July 10, 2012), the Court granted the motion of the customer defendants to stay the patent infringement actions against them pending resolution of the declaratory judgment action filed

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Commonwealth Research Group LLC v. Lattice Semiconductor Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 11-655-RGA (D.Del., June 28, 2012), the Court denied defendant’s motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 finding that defendant did not prove that the litigation was brought in

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Round Rock Research LLC v. Dole Food Company Inc., Civil Action No. 11-1239-RGA (D.Del., April 6, 2012), Round Rock Research LLC v. Gap Inc., Civil Action No. 11-1241-RGA (D.Del., April 6, 2012), and Round Rock Research LLC v. Hanesbrands Inc., Civil

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Shire LLC, et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-329-RGA (D.Del., March 22, 2012), the Court issued its claim construction ruling on the disputed terms of three patents, U.S. Patent Numbers 5,854,290, 6,287,599 and 6,811,794, covering the drug Intuniv®

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Richard G. Andrews in the consolidated cases of Robocast, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-235-RGA (D.Del., February 24, 2012) and Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, Civil Action No. 10-1055-RGA (D.Del., February 24, 2012), the Court denied the motions to transfer of defendants Apple and