By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in Pharmacyclics LLC et al. v. Alvogen Pine Brook LLC et al., Civil Action No. 19-0434-CFC-CJB (D.Del. August 19,
Continue Reading Chief Judge Connolly Issues Comprehensive Opinion Setting Forth Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Infringement Claims and Invalidity Defenses as to Patents-in-Suit Following ANDA Trial

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Green Mountain Glass LLC & Culchrome LLC v. Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc. d/b/a Veralla North America, Civil Action No.
Continue Reading Judge Sleet Denies Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Following Jury Verdict in Plaintiffs’ Favor in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Ladatech, LLC v. Illumina, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 09-627-SLR (D.Del., January 24, 2012), the Court granted

Continue Reading Judge Robinson Issues Court’s Rulings on Several Dispositive Motions Filed by Parties in Infringement Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Dey Pharma, L.P., et al., Civil Action 06-113-LPS (D.Del., January 18, 2012), the Court

Continue Reading Judge Stark Agrees with Defendants that Material Contained in Two Patents Amount to Single Reference for Purposes of Anticipation Defense

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc., Civil Action No. 07-272-SLR (D.Del., September 15, 2011), the Court granted Defendant

Continue Reading Judge Robinson Grants Palm’s and Intermec’s Motions For Summary Judgment on Invalidity and Infringement in Part

By an opinion rendered by the Honorable Mary Pat Thynge, dated February 5, 2010, in Inline Corp. v. Earthlink, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granted the motion for judgment as a matter of law of plaintiff, Inline Connection Corporation ("Inline"), as to the jury’s patent invalidity verdict, but denied the motion as to the jury’s non-infringement verdict.  The Court also denied Inline’s motion for a new trial.

A copy of the opinion is attached.

Continue Reading D.DEL. GRANTS INLINE’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS MATTER OF LAW IN PART