Intellectual Property and Antitrust Litigation in Delaware
By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Mary Pat Thynge in Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 09-80-LPS-MPT (October 6, 2010), the…
Continue Reading Judge Thynge Denies Motion to Bifurcate Parties’ Damages Claims in Patent Action
On April 30, 2010, The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. issued the opinion setting forth the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in the second phase of the patent infringement action…
Continue Reading Judge Farnan Issues Second Phase Opinion in LGD v. AUO
By Memorandum Opinion dated January 5, 2010 (PDF) drafted by Judge Farnan, the Court denied Plaintiff Dow Chemical’s motion for an expedited separate trial on the amount of its damages after…
Continue Reading COURT DENIES DOW CHEMICAL’S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED SEPARATE TRIAL ON DAMAGES
By Memorandum Order by Judge Sue Robinson dated October 1, 2009 (PDF), the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted the motion of plaintiffs, Eurand, Inc. (“Eurand”) and Cephalon, Inc. (“Cephalon”), to sever and stay discovery on the antitrust and patent misuse counterclaims and related affirmative defense asserted by defendants, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mylan Inc. After balancing the equities, the Court found that bifurcation of plaintiffs’ patent infringement action from defendants’ antitrust counterclaims and patent misuse affirmative defense and counterclaim was warranted.…
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse our website you consent to our use of cookies as set forth in our Cookie Policy. Learn More
