By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in TQ Delta, LLC v. 2Wire, Inc., Civil Action No. 13-1835-RGA (D.Del. July 14, 2021), the Court denied Defendant’s
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Denies Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Expert Witness Testimony Relating to the Testing of the Accused Infringing Products

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., Civil Action No. 19-662-CFC-CJB (D.Del. May 7, 2021), the Court granted Natera’s motion
Continue Reading District of Delaware Grants Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiff Damages Expert’s Testimony in False Advertising Action under the Lanham Act

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Ingevity Corp. et al. v. BASF Corp., Civil Action No. 18-1391-RGA (D.Del. October 21, 2020), the Court denied
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Denies Without Prejudice Plaintiff’s Daubert Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendant’s Experts in Support of Patent Misuse Defense

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Cirba Inc. d/b/a Densify) et al. v. VMware, Inc., Civil Action No. 19-742-LPS (D.Del. January 7, 2020), the
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendant’s Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Trademark Expert for Lack of Reliable Methodology or Principles

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Alarm.com, Inc. et al. v. Securenet Technologies LLC, Civil Action No. 15-807-RGA (D.Del. January 8, 2019), the Court
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Grants in Part Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Expert’s Lost Profits Opinion in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. 10X Genomics, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-152-RGA (D.Del. November 2, 2018), the
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Denies Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Supplemental Expert Report and Opinion of Plaintiffs’ Damages Expert in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Intel Corp. v. Future Link Systems, LLC, Civil Action No. 14-377-LPS (D.Del. June 1, 2017), the Court denied
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Denies Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Motions to Exclude Each Others Damages Experts’ Opinions

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Insight Equity d/b/a Vision-Ease Lens Worldwide v. Transitions Optical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-635-RGA (D.Del. May 9, 2017),
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Substantially Denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Defendant Expert’s Opinions on Definition of Relevant Market in Antitrust Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sherry R. Fallon in Monec Holdings AG v. Motorola Mobility, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 11-798-LPS-SRF (D.Del., September 5, 2014), the
Continue Reading Judge Fallon Strikes Plaintiff’s Opening Summary Judgment and Daubert Papers Due to Plaintiff’s Violation of Page Limitation on Briefs