By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Richard G. Andrews in IPA Technologies, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 16-1266-RGA (D.Del. October 28, 2021), the Court granted Amazon’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,851,115 (“the ‘115 patent”) and 7,069,560 (“the ‘560 patent”) after finding that Plaintiff
doctrine of equivalents
Judge Andrews Adopts Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation in Part in Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of the Patent-in-Suit
By Gregory B. Williams on
By Memorandum entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in M2M Solutions LLC et al. v. Sierra Wireless America, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 14-1102-RGA (D.Del. March 31, 2021), the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,648,717 (“the ‘717 Patent”) with respect to the “exclusive set…
Judge Andrews Grants Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Untimely Disclosed Theories of Patent Infringement in Opening Expert Report
By Gregory B. Williams on
By Memorandum entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Viatech Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Civil Action No. 17-570-RGA (D.Del. February 19, 2021), the Court granted Defendant’s motion to strike barring Plaintiff from asserting, and its expert from opining on (1) any theory under the doctrine of equivalents (“DOE”) other than for the…
Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement Under Doctrine of Equivalents
By Gregory B. Williams on
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Osseo Imaging, LLC v. Planmeca USA Inc., Civil Action No. 17-1386-LPS (D.Del. October 28, 2020), the Court, inter alia, denied Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of no infringement with respect to literal infringement and granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of no…
Judge Andrews Grants Defendants’ Motion to Exclude a Portion of Plaintiff’s Damages Expert’s Opinion in Patent Infringement Action
By Gregory B. Williams on
By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in TC Technology LLC v. Sprint Corp., Civil Action No. 16-153 – RGA (D.Del. October 18, 2019), the Court granted Defendants’ motion to exclude a portion of Plaintiff’s damages expert’s opinion relating to a 5% royalty rate after finding that (1) the opinion failed…
Judge Sleet Denies Macleods Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in ANDA Action
By Gregory B. Williams on
By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Amgen Inc. v. Macleods Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Civil Action No. 17-817-GMS (D.Del. December 19, 2017) (consolidated), the Court denied the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of defendants Macleods Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and Macleods Pharma USA, Inc. (collectively, “Macleods”).
Plaintiff Amgen filed the patent infringement…
Judge Sleet Finds that Actavis’ Proposed ANDA Products Infringe Recro’s Asserted Patents
By Gregory B. Williams on
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Recro Gainesville LLC v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-1118-GMS (D.Del. February 24, 2017)(consolidated), the Court, following a three-day bench trial and having considered the entire record in the case and the applicable law, concluded that Actavis’ proposed ANDA products infringe…