By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Maryellen Noreika in TRUSTID, Inc. v. Next Caller, Inc., Civil Action No. 18-172-MN (D.Del. January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next
Continue Reading Judge Noreika Grants Defendant’s Post-Trial Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Reversing the Jury’s Finding of Liability for False Advertising under the Lanham Act and Award of Punitive Damages Against Defendant

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Peleton Interactive, Inc. v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Civil Action No. 20-662-RGA (D.Del. May 28, 2021), the
Continue Reading District of Delaware Concludes that ICON’s Alleged Claims Against Peleton for Statements Concerning “Innovation” Fail to State a Claim under the Lanham Act

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., Civil Action No. 19-662-CFC-CJB (D.Del. May 7, 2021), the Court granted Natera’s motion
Continue Reading District of Delaware Grants Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiff Damages Expert’s Testimony in False Advertising Action under the Lanham Act

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in 10x Genomics, Inc. v. Celsee, Inc., Civil Action No. 19-862-CFC-SRF (D.Del. April 8, 2021), the Court denied Defendant’s
Continue Reading Judge Connolly Denies Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s False Advertising Claims under the Lanham Act and Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Act

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Maryellen Noreika in Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC v. SPX Corporation et al., Civil Action No. 19-529-MN (D.Del. November 4, 2020),
Continue Reading Judge Noreika Denies Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees in Alleged Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Halosil Int’l, Inc. et al. v. Eco-Evolutions, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 18-1375-RGA (D.Del. July 14, 2020),
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claims of False Advertising

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., Civil Action No. 19-662-CFC (D.Del. January 24, 2020), the Court adopted the Report
Continue Reading Judge Connolly Adopts the Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Burke to Deny Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Lanham Act and Unfair Competition Claims

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in SurgiQuest v. Lexion Medical, LLC., Civil Action No. 14-382-GMS (D.Del. May 16, 2018), the Court denied Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant SurgiQuest’s
Continue Reading Judge Sleet Denies SurgiQuest’s JMOL Motion After Finding Evidence Was Sufficient to Support Jury’s Verdict of False Advertising and Unfair Competition

By Memorandum Order entered by the Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Neutrogena Corporation, Civil Action No. 09-642-SLR (D.Del., June 8, 2011), the Court denied

Continue Reading Judge Robinson Finds That Neutrogena’s Challenged Advertisements Were Literally False But Denies Schering-Plough’s Motion for Permanent Injunction