indefiniteness

Subscribe to indefiniteness

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in University of Massachusetts et al. v. L’Oréal USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 17-0868-CFC-SRF (D.Del. April 20, 2021), the…
Continue Reading Judge Connolly Grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in HIP, Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corp. et al., Civil Action No. 18-1615-CFC (D.Del. June 24, 2019), the Court…
Continue Reading Judge Connolly Grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness Declaring Patent-in-Suit Invalid

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 17-275-LPS (D.Del. June…
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Portion of Court’s Claim Construction Order

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Cox Communications Inc., et al. v. Sprint Communications L.P., et al., Civil Action No. 12-487-SLR (D.Del., May 15,…
Continue Reading Judge Robinson Grants Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity Finding Patent Claim Indefinite

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-540-LPS (D.Del., May 4, 2015), the Court granted…
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment in Part as to No Invalidity of Patent-in-Suit

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Technology Innovations, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-690-SLR (D.Del., March 31, 2014), the Court granted defendant…
Continue Reading Judge Robinson Grants Amazon’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity and Concludes that Sanctions Are Warranted in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc., Civil Action No. 07-272-SLR (D.Del., September 15, 2011), the Court granted Defendant…

Continue Reading Judge Robinson Grants Palm’s and Intermec’s Motions For Summary Judgment on Invalidity and Infringement in Part

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in the consolidated patent infringement action, Aventis Pharma S.A., et al. v. Hospira, Inc., C.A. No 07-721-GMS and Aventis Pharma S.A., et al. v. Apotex, Inc., C.A. No. 08-496-GMS (D.Del., September 27, 2010), the Court concluded, among other things, that (1) claims 2 and 10 of the ‘561 patent are invalid due to indefiniteness; (2) all asserted claims of the patents-in-suit are invalid due to obviousness; and (3) the asserted claims are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. Id. at 2. The Court made its ruling following a seven day bench trial and post-trial submissions by the parties.

A complete copy of the Memorandum Opinion is attached.
 …

Continue Reading Chief Judge Sleet Finds Two Of The Asserted Claims Of Plaintiffs’ Patent-In-Suit Are Invalid Due To Indefiniteness