By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Natera, Inc. v. Inivata, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 21-56-LPS (D.Del. March 14, 2022), the Court denied
Continue Reading Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in Patent Infringement Action Claiming Defendants’ Lung Cancer Diagnostic Test Product Infringes Plaintiff’s Patent Technology
By Memorandum Order entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark following oral argument in Invitae Corp. v. Natera, Inc., Civil Action No. 21-669-LPS (D.Del. November 29, 2021), the Court
Continue Reading Judge Stark Denies Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 After Finding Patent-in-Suit Is Not Directed to an Abstract Idea
By Memorandum Order entered by the Honorable Maryellen Noreika in Vertigo Media, Inc. et al. v. Earbuds Inc., Civil Action No. 21-120-MN (D.Del. October 14, 2021), the Court denied
Continue Reading Judge Noreika Denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Patent Infringement Action
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Express Mobile, Inc. v. Squarespace, Inc., Civil Action No. 20-1163-RGA (D.Del. August 25, 2021), the Court, inter alia
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Denies Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Allegations of Direct Infringement
By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Peleton Interactive, Inc. v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Civil Action No. 20-662-RGA (D.Del. May 28, 2021), the
Continue Reading District of Delaware Concludes that ICON’s Alleged Claims Against Peleton for Statements Concerning “Innovation” Fail to State a Claim under the Lanham Act
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Stragent, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC et al., Civil Action No. 20-510-LPS (D.Del. March 25, 2021)
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaints Asserting Patent Infringement Due to the Use of AUTOSTAR Communication Technology in Defendants’ Vehicles
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. et al. v. Hyosung TNS, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 19-1695-LPS (D.Del. March 4,
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Allows a Portion of Defendants’ Counterclaim and Affirmative Defense of Inequitable Conduct to Proceed After Considering Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike
By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Lithero, LLC v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Civil Action No. 19-2320-RGA (D.Del. August 13, 2020), the Court found that
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Finds Plaintiff Failed to Plead a Plausible Trade Secret Misappropriation Claim
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Brightcove Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 19-1190-CFC (D.Del. July 20, 2020), the
Continue Reading Judge Connolly Grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Patent Infringement Claims in Part and Denies in Part
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in Power Integrations, Inc. v. CogniPower LLC, Civil Action No. 20-15-CFC (D.Del. July 1, 2020), the Court granted Defendant’s
Continue Reading Judge Connolly Dismisses Plaintiff’s Claims Seeking Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement for Failure to Establish Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction