By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. et al. v. Hyosung TNS, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 19-1695-LPS (D.Del. March 4,
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Allows a Portion of Defendants’ Counterclaim and Affirmative Defense of Inequitable Conduct to Proceed After Considering Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike

By Memorandum entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Viatech Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Civil Action No. 17-570-RGA (D.Del. February 19, 2021), the Court granted Defendant’s motion
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Grants Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Untimely Disclosed Theories of Patent Infringement in Opening Expert Report

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in 3Shape A/S v. Align Technology, Inc., Civil Action No. 18-886-LPS (D.Del. February 1, 2021), the Court overruled the
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Overrules Plaintiff’s Objections and Adopts the Order of Magistrate Judge Hall Denying Plaintiff’s Requests to Strike and Preclude Use of Certain Evidence at Trial

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in TC Technology LLC v. Sprint Corp., Civil Action No. 16-153 – RGA (D.Del. October 18, 2019), the Court
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Grants Defendants’ Motion to Exclude a Portion of Plaintiff’s Damages Expert’s Opinion in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Masimo Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America. Corp. et al., Civil Action No. 09-90-LPS-MPT (D.Del., August 15, 2016),
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Reply Expert Report in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in HSM Portfolio LLC, et al. v. Elpida Memory Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 11-770-RGA (D.Del., February 11,
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Grants Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Expert’s Reply Infringement Report With Respect to New Infringement Theory Asserted Therein

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Vite Technologies, LLC v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-1507-SLR (D.Del., July 23, 2015), the Court
Continue Reading Judge Robinson Strikes Unnecessary and Scandalous Material about Patent Inventor from Defendant’s Answer to Complaint Alleging Patent Infringement

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sherry R. Fallon in Monec Holdings AG v. Motorola Mobility, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 11-798-LPS-SRF (D.Del., September 5, 2014), the
Continue Reading Judge Fallon Strikes Plaintiff’s Opening Summary Judgment and Daubert Papers Due to Plaintiff’s Violation of Page Limitation on Briefs

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Netgear, Inc. v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-999-SLR (D.Del., October 2, 2013), the Court granted Defendant
Continue Reading Judge Robinson Grants Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portion of Plaintiff’s Answer to Counterclaims in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Softview LLC v. Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC, Civil Action No. 10-389-LPS (D.Del., September 30, 2011), the

Continue Reading Judge Stark Grants Softview’s Motion to Strike Defendants Apple and AT&T Mobility’s Inequitable Conduct Defenses