Following a three-day bench trial in the matter on June 5-7, 2017 and after having considered the entire record in the case and the applicable law, the Court, through Trial
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Finds Plaintiff Proved Infringement of Asserted Claims of Patents-in-Suit Following Three-Day Bench Trial in Hatch-Waxman Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-540-LPS (D.Del., May 4, 2015), the Court granted
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Grants Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment in Part as to No Invalidity of Patent-in-Suit

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Pfizer Inc., et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., C.A. No. 10-528-GMS (D.Del., October 22, 2014), the Court, following
Continue Reading After Bench Trial, Judge Sleet Concludes that None of the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in-Suit Are Invalid Due to Obviousness

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Abbvie Inc. v. Hospira, Inc., C.A. No. 11-648- GMS (D.Del., October 24, 2014), the Court, following a two
Continue Reading After Bench Trial, Judge Sleet Concludes that Hospira’s Proposed Product Does Not Infringe the Patent-in-Suit Asserted by Abbvie

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc., Civil Action No. 07-272-SLR (D.Del., September 15, 2011), the Court granted Defendant

Continue Reading Judge Robinson Grants Palm’s and Intermec’s Motions For Summary Judgment on Invalidity and Infringement in Part