By Memorandum Order entered by the Honorable Maryellen Noreika in Apex Clearing Corp. v. Axos Financial Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 19-2066-MN (D.Del. September 24, 2021), the Court (1) denied Plaintiff Apex Clearing Corporation’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of defendants’ experts Mumford and Distler; (2) denied Plaintiff Axos Bank’s motion for

The Honorable Sherry R. Fallon in Broadsoft, Inc. v. Callwave Communication, LLC, Civil Action No. 13-711-RGA (D.Del. August 8, 2019) issued a Magistrate Judge Opinion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) and District of Delaware Local Rule 72(a)(2), denying Plaintiff Broadsoft, Inc.’s motion to declare the case exceptional

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC v. Dish Network, LLC, Civil Action No. 13-02066-RGA (D.Del. November 7, 2018) (consolidated), the Court denied the motions of Defendants DISH Network, LLC and Sirius XM Radio Inc. requesting the Court to declare the case exceptional and award reasonable

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in M2M Solutions LLC v. Motorola Solutions Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 12-33-RGA (D.Del., January 6, 2016), the Court granted the motion for summary judgment of Defendants Telit Communications PLC and Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. related to damages after concluding that Defendants were

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Intellectual Ventures I, LLC, et al. v. Canon Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 11-792-SLR (D.Del., May 18, 2015), the Court granted plaintiff’s alternative motion for a new trial regarding infringement of U.S. Patent Numbers 6,121,960 (“the ‘960 patent”) and 5,754,348 (“the ‘348

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Apeldyn Corp. v. Sony Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 11-440-SLR (D.Del., April 2, 2015), the Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement due to collateral estoppel.  In doing so, the Court found that (1) the parties did not dispute that

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Toshiba Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 09-354-LPS (D.Del., August 27, 2014), the Court denied the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,630,163 of defendants’ Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc., C.A. No. 10-258-SLR-MPT (D.Del., September 5, 2013), the Court granted defendant Apple’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) with respect to invalidity and non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,253,075 (“the ‘075 patent”) and

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-428-SLR (D.Del., April 25, 2013), the Court, as a practical matter, denied plaintiff Golden Bridge Technology, Inc.’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order of April 9, 2013 granting summary judgment

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Cooper Notification, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 09-685-LPS (D.Del., July 16, 2012), the Court denied the requests of Plaintiff Cooper Notification, Inc. for reconsideration or reargument, leave to file supplemental infringement reports, and clarification of the Court’s claim construction