By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in TQ Delta, LLC v. 2Wire, Inc., Civil Action No. 13-1835-RGA (D.Del. July 14, 2021), the Court denied Defendant’s
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Denies Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Expert Witness Testimony Relating to the Testing of the Accused Infringing Products

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Maryellen Noreika in Sentient Sensors, LLC v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp., Civil Action No. 19-1868-MN (D.Del. June 24, 2021), the Court denied Defendant
Continue Reading District of Delaware Denies Defendant’s Motion for Further Construction of Previously Construed Claim Term in Dispute But Leaves Door Open that It May Further Construe the Same Term Again Before or During Infringement Trial

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Maryellen Noreika in SIPCO, LLC v. Aruba Networks, LLC et al., Civil Action No. 20-537-MN (D.Del. June 9, 2021), the Court denied
Continue Reading District of Delaware Denies Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Peleton Interactive, Inc. v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Civil Action No. 20-662-RGA (D.Del. May 28, 2021), the
Continue Reading District of Delaware Concludes that ICON’s Alleged Claims Against Peleton for Statements Concerning “Innovation” Fail to State a Claim under the Lanham Act

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in University of Massachusetts et al. v. L’Oréal USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 17-0868-CFC-SRF (D.Del. April 20, 2021), the
Continue Reading Judge Connolly Grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness in Patent Infringement Action

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in In re Chanbond, LLC, Patent Litigation, Civil Action No. 15-842-RGA (D.Del. April 16, 2021) (consolidated), the Court denied
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Denies Defendants’ Motion to Reopen Discovery in Patent Infringement Actions with First Trial Imminent

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Stragent, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC et al., Civil Action No. 20-510-LPS (D.Del. March 25, 2021)
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaints Asserting Patent Infringement Due to the Use of AUTOSTAR Communication Technology in Defendants’ Vehicles

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. et al. v. Hyosung TNS, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 19-1695-LPS (D.Del. March 4,
Continue Reading Chief Judge Stark Allows a Portion of Defendants’ Counterclaim and Affirmative Defense of Inequitable Conduct to Proceed After Considering Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike

By Memorandum Opinion entered in Conformis, Inc. v. Medacta USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 19-1528-RGA (D.Del. March 4, 2021), The Honorable Richard G. Andrews construed the remaining terms in dispute
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Issues Markman Opinion Construing Remaining Terms in Dispute in Four Patents-in-Suit in Infringement Action Involving Patents on Surgical Tools

By Memorandum entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Viatech Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Civil Action No. 17-570-RGA (D.Del. February 19, 2021), the Court granted Defendant’s motion
Continue Reading Judge Andrews Grants Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Untimely Disclosed Theories of Patent Infringement in Opening Expert Report