By Memorandum Opinion entered in St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10-982-LPS (D.Del., August 7, 2012), the Honorable Leonard P. Stark construed

Continue Reading Judge Stark Issues Markman Opinion Construing 16 Terms in Dispute in Patent Infringement Action Against Apple and Others

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Cooper Notification, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 09-685-LPS (D.Del., July 16, 2012), the Court

Continue Reading Judge Stark Denies Plaintiff’s Requests for Reconsideration or Reargument of Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Magnetar Technologies Corp., et al. v. Six Flag Theme Parks Inc., et al., Civil Action 07-127-LPS-MPT (D.Del., February

Continue Reading Judge Stark Renders Court’s Markman Rulings in Patent Infringement Action Filed Against Amusement Park Operators

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Dey Pharma, L.P., et al., Civil Action 06-113-LPS (D.Del., January 18, 2012), the Court

Continue Reading Judge Stark Agrees with Defendants that Material Contained in Two Patents Amount to Single Reference for Purposes of Anticipation Defense

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Softview LLC v. Apple Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-389-LPS (D.Del., December 7, 2011), the Court denied Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration asking the Court to reconsider its September 30, 2011 Order granting Plaintiff Softview’s Motion to Amend Its Complaint to add parties and accused devices utilizing Android software.

A copy of the Memorandum Opinion is attached hereto.
 

Continue Reading Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration Based on Provision of America Invents Act

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 11-965-LPS (D.Del.

Continue Reading Judge Stark Denies Plaintiffs’ Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction But Indicates Court’s Intent to Resolve Ownership of Patents-in-Suit on Expedited Basis

By Order, dated September 22, 2011, and Opinion later entered explaining the Court’s reasoning by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark, in Ateliers De La Haute-Garonne, et al. v. Broetje Automation-USA Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 09-598-LPS (D.Del., September 26, 2011, unsealed October 4, 2011), the Court granted the motion of defendants Broetje Automation-USA, Inc. and Bröetje-Automation GMBH (collectively, “Broetje”) for partial summary judgment of invalidity for failure to disclose the best mode as required by 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 1.

A copy of the Court’s Opinion is attached.
 

Continue Reading Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Failure to Disclose Best Mode

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Ateliers De La Haute-Garonne, et al. v. Broetje Automation-USA Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 09-598-LPS (D.Del., October

Continue Reading Judge Stark Denies Broetje’s Motion to Dismiss Alleging Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Patent-in-Suit