By Memorandum Opinion entered in St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Acer, Inc., et al., the Honorable Leonard P. Stark construed fifteen disputed terms found in U.S. Patent
Stark
Judge Stark Issues Markman Opinion Construing 16 Terms in Dispute in Patent Infringement Action Against Apple and Others
By Memorandum Opinion entered in St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10-982-LPS (D.Del., August 7, 2012), the Honorable Leonard P. Stark construed…
Judge Stark Denies Plaintiff’s Requests for Reconsideration or Reargument of Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement
By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Cooper Notification, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 09-685-LPS (D.Del., July 16, 2012), the Court…
Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement
By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Tarkus Imaging, Inc. v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10-63-LPS (D.Del., June 14, 2012), the Court…
Continue Reading Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement
Judge Stark Renders Court’s Markman Rulings in Patent Infringement Action Filed Against Amusement Park Operators
By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Magnetar Technologies Corp., et al. v. Six Flag Theme Parks Inc., et al., Civil Action 07-127-LPS-MPT (D.Del., February…
Judge Stark Agrees with Defendants that Material Contained in Two Patents Amount to Single Reference for Purposes of Anticipation Defense
By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Dey Pharma, L.P., et al., Civil Action 06-113-LPS (D.Del., January 18, 2012), the Court…
Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration Based on Provision of America Invents Act
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Softview LLC v. Apple Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-389-LPS (D.Del., December 7, 2011), the Court denied Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration asking the Court to reconsider its September 30, 2011 Order granting Plaintiff Softview’s Motion to Amend Its Complaint to add parties and accused devices utilizing Android software.
A copy of the Memorandum Opinion is attached hereto.
…
Judge Stark Denies Plaintiffs’ Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction But Indicates Court’s Intent to Resolve Ownership of Patents-in-Suit on Expedited Basis
By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 11-965-LPS (D.Del.…
Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Failure to Disclose Best Mode
By Order, dated September 22, 2011, and Opinion later entered explaining the Court’s reasoning by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark, in Ateliers De La Haute-Garonne, et al. v. Broetje Automation-USA Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 09-598-LPS (D.Del., September 26, 2011, unsealed October 4, 2011), the Court granted the motion of defendants Broetje Automation-USA, Inc. and Bröetje-Automation GMBH (collectively, “Broetje”) for partial summary judgment of invalidity for failure to disclose the best mode as required by 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 1.
A copy of the Court’s Opinion is attached.
…
Judge Stark Denies Broetje’s Motion to Dismiss Alleging Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Patent-in-Suit
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Ateliers De La Haute-Garonne, et al. v. Broetje Automation-USA Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 09-598-LPS (D.Del., October…