By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-1318-LPS (D.Del. September 29, 2017), the Court denied Defendant Plantronics, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment which contended that any foreclosure effect of Defendant’s exclusive dealing arrangement with its distributors was negated by Plaintiff GN

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. Symantec Corp. et al., C.A. No. 13-440-LPS (D.Del. February 13, 2017), the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of patent ineligibility upon finding that the claims at issue – claims 25 and 33 of U.S.

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Arrowpoint Capital Corp. v. Arrowpoint Asset Management, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 10-161 (D.Del. October 11, 2016), the Court granted Plaintiff Arrowpoint Capital Corp.’s motion for partial summary judgment in its trademark infringement action against Defendants Arrowpoint Asset Management, LLC, et al

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Unwired Planet, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, Civil Action No. 14-967-SLR (D.Del., June 15, 2016), the Court granted plaintiff Unwired Planet, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment after concluding that the agreement between Unwired Planet and Lenovo PC International Limited satisfied the conditions of a

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Toshiba Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 09-354-LPS (D.Del., August 27, 2014), the Court denied the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,630,163 of defendants’ Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Pi-Net International Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., Civil Action No. 12-282 SLR (D.Del., May 14, 2014), the Court, among other things, granted defendant JP Morgan’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,987,500 (“the ‘500 patent”), 8,037,158

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Technology Innovations, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-690-SLR (D.Del., March 31, 2014), the Court granted defendant Amazon’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,429,965 (“the ‘965 patent”). The Court also found that plaintiff’s assertion of U.S. Patent

By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Tarkus Imaging, Inc. v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10-63-LPS (D.Del., June 14, 2012), the Court denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment of non-infringement, invalidity and no indirect infringement concluding that the record evidence raised genuine issues of material fact. The

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Solvay, S.A. v. Honeywell Specialty Materials LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 06-557-SLR (D.Del., August 26, 2011), the Court granted defendant Honeywell’s motion for summary judgment of no willful infringement. The Court concluded that summary judgment of no willfulness was appropriate “because Honeywell

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Autocell Laboratories, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc., Civil Action No. 08-760 (D.Del., January 5, 2011), the Court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the patent in dispute, and denied plaintiff’s motion for