trademark infringement

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Maryellen Noreika in Dr. Matthias Rath et al. v. Vita Sanotec, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 17-953-MN (D.Del. October 2, 2020), the Court granted the motion of Plaintiffs Dr. Matthias Rath, Dr. Rath International and Dr. Rath Health Programs B.V. (“Plaintiffs”) seeking attorneys’ fees be assessed

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Maryellen Noreika in New Balance Athletics, Inc. v. USA New Bunren International Co. Ltd., LLC, Civil Action No. 17-1700 (MN), the Court denied Defendant New Bunren’s motion for partial reconsideration of the Court’s prior ruling concluding that Plaintiff New Balance Athletics was entitled to statutory damages under

In Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc., No. 18-233, 590 U.S. _____ (2020), the United States Supreme Court held that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement action, brought under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), that alleges and proves trademark infringement is not required to show that the defendant willfully infringed the plaintiff’s trademark as

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Perlight Solar Co. Ltd v. Perlight Sales North America LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 14-331-LPS (D.Del., September 18, 2015), the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint alleging trademark infringement against Defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction as to Defendants Perlight